Sorry for long question, and thank you for any input, explanation or Intel link/whitepapers for reading. If Iris is better, why Intel doesn’t have a desktop grade CPU with Iris, but only with UHD Graphics line? Come back to my initial question: i5-9500T vs i5-8259U for occasional video editing? That means that non Iris doesn’t do it so well? And Intel says that Iris perform fast encoding in H265. I found a comparison in Youtube between Iris and UHD Graphics in a game. From other side, i5-9500T consumes more power (is that bad for a desktop?!) and has 6 cores, but it comes with UHD Graphics 630. But in the same time, i5-8259U has just 4 cores, and it’s 28w. I read that Iris is the top or integrated GPU. Unfortunately I’m not well understanding what’s going at Intel because lack of information or my understanding. The heaviest task that I’ll perform sometimes is video editing, mostly in 1080p. The first graph shows the relative performance of the videocard compared to the 10 other common videocards in terms of PassMark G3D Mark. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily. I have two options: i5-9500T with Intel® UHD Graphics 630 or i5-8259U with Iris® Plus Graphics 655. Price and performance details for the Intel Iris Plus 655 can be found below. I would like to upgrade my laptop to a tiny desktop. To perform the performance test we have used an Intel NUC NUC8i7BEH mini PC, equipped with an Intel Core i7-8559U processor (which is the second best of those that incorporate this integrated graphics) accompanied by 16 GB of DDR4 RAM at 2400 MHz in SO-DIMM format and a 512 GB Crucial MX500 SATA3 SSD.Hi everybody! I’m not sure if I can use this forum for advice, but let me know if that forum is not for that.
It is not that a 720p gaming experience with graphics at a minimum is going to be satisfactory precisely, but at least we can play. However, there are possibilities of being able to use it to play some simple games at 1080p even if we don’t reach 60 FPS and, in fact, if we lower the resolution to 720p, there will still be more games that will be “playable”. All this, of course, looking at the specifications on paper. By specifications, this is, without a doubt, a graphics that is not designed to play, and despite the fact that it supports 4K resolution at most, we cannot expect to be able to play at 1080p and 60 FPS, not even with graphics at a minimum.
0 kommentar(er)
